Medicare's New Payment Model Is Built for AI
The ACCESS Program: A Federal Framework for AI-Driven Healthcare
On April 30, 2025, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) accepted 150 participants into ACCESS (Advancing Chronic Care with Effective, Scalable Solutions) — a 10-year Medicare program testing AI-driven medical care at federal scale. The program launches July 5, 2025.
Key Innovation: Outcome-Based Payment Structure
Traditional Medicare reimburses based on clinician time spent with patients. ACCESS changes this fundamentally:
- Participants receive predictable payments for managing chronic conditions
- Payment is outcome-based: full amounts earned only when patients meet measurable health goals (lower blood pressure, reduced pain, etc.)
- Creates the first federal payment mechanism for AI agents that:
- Monitor patients between visits
- Make check-in calls
- Coordinate housing referrals
- Ensure medication pickup
Covered Conditions
- Diabetes
- Hypertension
- Chronic kidney disease
- Obesity
- Depression
- Anxiety
Case Study: Pair Team's AI-First Model
Neil Batlivala's company Pair Team was accepted as one of the 150 participants. The company has spent seven years building toward this moment:
Company Profile:
- Founded in 2019
- ~850 clinical professionals
- Runs California's largest community health workforce
- Revenue: above nine figures
- Funding: ~$30 million from Kleiner Perkins, Kraft Ventures, Next Ventures
Target Population:
Patients managing chronic conditions who also face:
- Unstable housing
- Food insecurity
- Lack of transportation
- (~33% of Americans)
Clinical Results:
Peer-reviewed study in Journal of General Internal Medicine showed:
- Strong patient engagement
- 1 in 4 hospital visits prevented
- 1 in 2 ER visits prevented
AI Implementation: Flora Voice Agent
Nine months ago, Pair Team deployed Flora, a voice AI agent as their primary patient interface:
Capabilities:
- Available 24/7
- Handles intake
- Coordinates referrals
- Performs check-ins between clinical visits
- Hour-long conversations now routine
- Serves as companionship intervention for isolated patients
Example: 67-year-old woman living in her car, managing PTSD and congestive heart failure, spoke with Flora for over an hour — likely her only substantive conversation in weeks.
Program Design: Built by Former Startup Operators
Key Architects:
- Abe Sutton - Director, CMS Innovation Center (former VC at Rubicon Founders)
- Jacob Shiff - Chief AI and Technology Officer, CMS Innovation Center (former healthcare founder)
Design Philosophy:
- Outcome-based payments
- Direct-to-consumer enrollment
- Deliberate push for competition
- Low reimbursement rates that require AI automation to be profitable
Critical Risks
Data Security:
- Sensitive patient data (housing, diseases, mental illness) fed into federal infrastructure
- CMS has documented history of breaches, including exposed Social Security numbers
- Particularly dangerous for vulnerable populations
Financial Viability:
- 2023 Congressional Budget Office analysis: CMS Innovation Center increased federal spending by $5.4 billion in first decade (instead of projected savings)
- CMS paying less per patient per month than many participants anticipated
- Economics only work for fully automated, AI-first operations
Market Implications
Batlivala's Thesis:
"If you want to build a model that truly incentivizes the use of AI, the reimbursement rates have to be low. The economics only work if you're running a lean, AI-first operation."
Pair Team's Growth Plan:
- Current access to ~500,000 potential patients through partnerships
- Target: 1 million patients within 3 years
Broader Market:
- Digital health funding hit highest Q1 total since pandemic in 2025
- AI companies capturing bulk of investment
- ACCESS program barely registered outside health tech trade press
The Bottom Line
Why This Matters: ACCESS creates the first federal payment infrastructure that requires AI automation to be economically viable. It's not about whether AI can handle healthcare coordination — it's that the payment model makes it mandatory. This is a structural forcing function for AI adoption in a $4+ trillion industry.
The Selection Effect: The low reimbursement rates aren't a bug — they're designed to filter for organizations that have already solved the automation problem. Traditional healthcare providers cannot participate profitably. Only AI-first companies can make the math work.
Regulatory Innovation: For the first time, the federal government is creating "swim lanes" where the best AI solution wins in a traditionally regulated industry, rather than incumbents maintaining advantage through compliance overhead.